top of page
Search

The Destruction of Richard Hooker's Manuscripts, Revisited

Writer: Daniel Graves
Daniel Graves
Apr 4
1 min read

Revisionist historians such as C.J. Sisson and David Novarr have dismissed Izaak Walton’s story of the destruction of Richard Hooker’s manuscripts as pure invention.  This paper re-evaluates Walton’s evidence, the hearsay chancery suit witness of the Staple Inn lawyer, Edmund Parbo, and the relationship of members of Hooker’s family to the list of possible culprits. The paper concludes that it is very likely that Hooker’s manuscripts were vandalized and that this act of vandalism ought properly to be seen in the context of a consistent conformist puritan critique of Hooker’s doctrine (as opposed to his ecclesiology).



Published in Anglican and Episcopal History 94.1 (March 2025)


Read it here:


 
 
 

Comments


Daniel Graves is a priest in the Anglican Diocese of Toronto, an Honorary Canon of St. James Cathedral, and instructor in the Licentiate in Theology Program at Huron University College in London, ON.  He has a BA (hons) from York University in Toronto, an MDiv and ThM from Trinity College (Toronto), and has done graduate work at McMaster University in Hamilton, ON. He is a member of the Executive Committee of the Canadian Church Historical Society and the Convenor of the Richard Hooker Society.

 

© 2026 by Daniel F. Graves. Powered and secured by Wix 

 

bottom of page